Saturday, February 15, 2003

The Story of Gerard Holmgren

Campaign: Team8Plus

Astute observers of history are aware that for every notable event there will usually be at least one, often several, wild conspiracy theories which spring up around it. "The CIA killed Hendrix", "The Pope had John Lennon murdered ", "Hitler was half Werewolf", "Space aliens replaced Nixon with a clone", etc, etc. The bigger the event, the more ridiculous and more numerous are the fanciful rantings which circulate in relation to it.

So it's hardly surprising that the events of Sept 11 2001 have spawned their fair share of these ludicrous fairy tales. And as always, there is sadly a small but gullible percentage of the population eager to lap up these tall tales, regardless of facts or rational analysis.

One of the wilder stories circulating about Sept 11, and one that has attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs is that it was carried out by 19 fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other than that they "hate our freedoms."

Never a group of people to be bothered by facts, the perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage across the internet and the media to the extent that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell. Normally I don't even bother debunking this kind of junk, but the effect that this paranoid myth is beginning to have requires a little rational analysis, in order to consign it to the same rubbish bin as all such silly conspiracy theories.

These crackpots even contend that the extremist Bush regime was caught unawares by the attacks, had no hand in organizing them, and actually would have stopped them if it had been able. Blindly ignoring the stand-down of the US Air Force, the insider trading on airline stocks — linked to the CIA, the complicit behavior of Bush on the morning of the attacks, the controlled demolition of the WTC, the firing of a missile into the Pentagon and a host of other documented proofs that the Bush regime was behind the attacks, the conspiracy theorists stick doggedly to a silly story about 19 Arab hijackers somehow managing to commandeer 4 planes simultaneously and fly them around US airspace for nearly 2 hours, crashing them into important buildings, without the US intelligence services having any idea that it was coming, and without the Air Force knowing what to do.

The huge difficulties with such a stupid story force them to invent even more preposturous stories to distract from its core silliness, and thus the tale has escalated into a mythic fantasy of truly gargantuan proportions.

It's difficult to apply rational analysis to such unmitigated stupidity, but that is the task which I take on in this article. However, it should be noted that one of the curious characteristics of conspiracy theorists is that they effortlessly change their so-called evidence in response to each aspect which is debunked. As soon as one delusion is unmasked, they simply invent another to replace it, and deny that the first ever existed. Eventually, when they have turned full circle through this endlessly changing fantasy fog , they then re-invent the original delusion and deny that you ever debunked it, thus beginning the circle once more. This technique is known as "the fruit loop" and saves the conspiracy theorist from ever having to see any of their ideas through to their (ill)logical conclusions.

According to the practitioners of the fruit loop, 19 Arabs took over the 4 planes by subduing the passengers and crew through the use of guns, knives, box cutters and gas, and then used electronic guidance systems which they had smuggled on board to fly the planes to their targets.

The suspension of disbelief required for this outrageous concoction is only for the hard-core conspiracy theorist. For a start, they conveniently skip over the awkward fact that there weren't any Arabs on the planes. If there were, one must speculate that they somehow got on board without being filmed by any of the security cameras and without being registered on the passenger lists. But the curly question of how they are supposed to have got on board is all too mundane for the exciting world of the conspiracy theorist. With vague mumblings that they must have been using false ID (but never specifying which IDs they are alleged to have used, or how these were traced to their real identities), they quickly bypass this problem, to relate exciting and sinister tales about how some of the fictitious fiends were actually searched before boarding because they looked suspicious. However, as inevitably happens with any web of lies, this simply paints them into an even more difficult corner. How are they supposed to have got on board with all that stuff if they were searched? And if they used gas in a confined space, they would have been affected themselves unless they also had masks in their luggage.

"Excuse me sir, why do you have a boxcutter, a gun, a container of gas, a gas mask and an electronic guidance unit in your luggage?" "A present for your grandmother? Very well sir, on you get." "Very strange", thinks the security officer. "That's the fourth Arab man without an Arabic name who just got on board with a knife, gun or boxcutter and gas mask. And why does that security camera keep flicking off every time one of these characters shows up? Must be one of those days I guess..."

Asking any of these basic questions to a conspiracy theorist is likely to cause a sudden leap to the claim that we know that they were on board because they left a credit card trail for the tickets they had purchased and cars they had rented. So if they used credit cards that identified them, how does that reconcile with the claim that they used false IDs to get on to the plane? But by this time the fruit loop is in full swing, as the conspiracy theorist tries to stay one jump ahead of this annoying and awkward rational analysis. They will allege that the hijackers' passports were found at the crash scenes. "So there!" they exalt triumphantly, their fanatical faces lighting up with that deranged look of one who has just a revelation of questionable sanity. Hmm? So they got on board with false IDs but took their real passports with them? However, by this time the fruit loop has been completely circumnavigated,and the conspiracy theorist exclaims impatiently, "Who said anything about false IDs? We know what seats they were sitting in! Their presence is well documented!" And so the whole loop starts again. "Well, why aren't they on the passenger lists?" "You numbskull! They assumed the identities of other passengers!" And so on...

Finally, out of sheer fascination with this circular method of creative delusion, the rational sceptic will allow them to get away with this loop, in order to move on to the next question, and see what further delights await us in the unraveling of this marvelously stupid story. "Uh, how come their passports survived fiery crashes that completely incinerated the planes and all the passengers? " The answer of course is that it's just one of those strange co-incidences, those little quirks of fate that do happen from time to time. You know, like the same person winning the lottery four weeks in a row. The odds are astronomical, but these things do happen...

This is another favourite deductive method of the conspiracy theorist. The "improbability drive", in which they decide upon a conclusion without any evidence whatsoever to support it, and then continually speculate a series of wildly improbable events and unbelievable co-incidences to support it, shrugging off the implausibility of each event with the vague assertion that sometimes the impossible happens (just about all the time in their world). There is a principle called "Occam's Razor" which suggests that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the simplest explanation is most likely to be correct. Conspiracy theorists hate Occam's razor.

Having for the sake of amusement, allowed them to get away with with the silly story of the 19 invisible Arabs, we move on to the question of how they are supposed to have taken over the planes. Hijacking a plane is not an easy thing to do. Hijacking it without the pilot being able to alert ground control is nearly impossible. The pilot has only to punch in a four-digit code to alert ground control to a hijacking. Unconcerned with the awkward question of plausibility, the conspiracy buffs maintain that on that Sept 11, the invisible hijackers took over the plane by the rather crude method of threatening people with boxcutters and knives, and spraying gas (after they had attached their masks, obviously), but somehow took control of the plane without the crew first getting a chance to punch in the hijacking code. Not just on one plane, but on all four. At this point in the tale, the conspiracy theorist is again forced to call upon the services of the improbability drive.

So now that our incredibly lucky hijackers have taken control of the planes, all four pilots fly them with breath-taking skill and certainty to their fiery end, all four pilots unflinching in their steely resolve for a swift meeting with Allah. Apart from their psychotic hatred of "our freedoms", it was their fanatical devotion to Islam which enabled them to summon up the iron will to do this. Which is strange, because according to another piece of hearsay peddled by the conspiracy buffs, these guys actually went out drinking and womanizing the night before their great martyrdom, even leaving their Korans in the bar — really impeccable Islamic behavior — and then got up at 5 am the next morning to pull off the greatest covert operation in history. This also requires us to believe that they were even clear-headed enough to learn how to fly the huge planes by reading flight manuals in Arabic in the car on the way to the airport. We know this because they supposedly left the flight manuals there for us to find.

It gets better. Their practical training had allegedly been limited to Cessnas and flight simulators, but this was no barrier to the unflinching certainty with which they took over the planes and skillfully guided them to their doom. If they are supposed to have done their flight training with these tools, which would be available just about anywhere in the world, it's not clear why they would have decided to risk blowing their cover to US intelligence services by doing the training in Florida, rather than somewhere in the Middle East, but such reasoning is foreign to the foggy world of the conspiracy theorist, too trapped in the constant rotation of the mental fruit loop to make their unsubstantiated fabrications seem even semi-believable.

Having triumphantly established a circular delusion in support of the mythical Arabs, the conspiracy theorist now confronts the difficult question of why there's nothing left of the planes. Anybody who has seen the endlessly-replayed footage of the second plane going into the WTC will realize that the plane was packed with explosives. Planes do not and cannot blow up into nothing in that manner when they crash.

Did the mythical Arabs also haul a huge heap of explosives on board, and manage to deploy them in such a manner that they went off in the exact instant of the crash, completely vapourizing the plane? This is a little difficult even for the conspiracy theorist, who at this point decides that it's easier to invent new laws of physics in order to keep the delusion rolling along.

There weren't any explosives. It wasn't an inside job. The plane blew up into nothing from its exploding fuel load! Remarkable! Sluggishly combustible jet fuel which is basically kerosine,and which burns at a maximum temperature of around 800°C has suddenly taken on the qualities of a ferociously explosive demolition agent, vapourizing 65 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke. Never mind that a plane of that size contains around 15 tons of steel and titanium, of which even the melting points are about double that of the maximum combustion temperature of kerosine — let alone the boiling point — which is what would be required to vapourize a plane. And then there's about 50 tons of aluminium to be accounted for. In excess of 15 lbs of metal for each gallon of kerosine.

For the conspiracy theorist, such inconvenient facts are vaguely dismissed as "mumbo jumbo". This convenient little phrase is their answer to just about anything factual or logical. Like a conjurer pulling a rabbit out of a hat, they suddenly become fanatically insistent about the devastating explosive qualities of kerosine, something hitherto completely unknown to science, but just discovered by them, this very minute. Blissfully ignoring the fact that never before or since in aviation history has a plane vapourized into nothing from an exploding fuel load, the conspiracy theorist relies upon Hollywood images, where the effects are are always larger than life, and certainly larger than the intellects of these cretins. "Its a well known fact that planes blow up into nothing on impact." they state with pompous certainty. "Watch any Bruce Willis movie." Care to provide any documented examples? If it's a well-known fact, then presumably this well-known fact springs from some kind of documentation — other than Bruce Willis movies?

At this point the mad but cunning eyes of the conspiracy theorist will narrow as they sense the corner that they have backed themselves into, and plan their escape by means of another stunning backflip.
"Ah, but planes have never crashed into buildings before, so there's no way of telling." they counter with a sly grin.
Well, actually planes have crashed into buildings before and since, and not vapourized into nothing.
"But not big planes, with that much fuel ", they shriek in hysterical denial. Or that much metal to vapourize.
"Yes but not hijacked planes!"
Are you suggesting that whether the crash is deliberate or accidental affects the combustion qualities of the fuel?
"Now you're just being silly".

Although collisions with buildings are rare, planes frequently crash into mountains, streets, other aircraft, nosedive into the ground, or have bombs planted aboard them, and don't vapourize into nothing. What's so special about a tower that's mostly glass? But by now, the conspiracy theorist has once again sailed happily around the fruit loop. "Its a well-documented fact that planes explode into nothing on impact."

Effortlessly weaving back and forth between the position that it's a "well-known fact" and that "it's never happened before, so we have nothing to compare it to", the conspiracy theorist has now convinced himself (if not too many other people) that the WTC plane was not loaded with explosives, and that the instant vapourization of the plane in a massive fireball was the same as any other plane crash you might care to mention. Round and round the fruit loop...

But the hurdles which confront the conspiracy theorist are many, and they are now forced to implement even more creative uses for the newly-discovered shockingly destructive qualities of kerosine. They have to explain how the Arabs also engineered the elegant vertical collapse of both the WTC towers, and for this awkward fact the easiest counter is to simply deny that it was a controlled demolition, and claim that the buildings collapsed from fire caused by the burning kerosine.

For this, it's necessary to sweep aside the second law of thermodynamics and propose kerosine which is not only impossibly destructive, but also recycles itself for a second burning in violation of the law of degradation of energy. You see, the kerosine not only consumed itself in a sudden catastrophic fireball, vapourizing a 65 ton plane into nothing, but then came back for a second go, burning at 2000°C for another hour at the impact point, melting the skyscraper's steel like butter. And while it was doing all this it also poured down the elevator shafts, starting fires all through the building. When I was at school there was a little thing called the entropy law which suggests that a given portion of fuel can only burn once, something which is readily observable in the real world, even for those who didn't make it to junior high school science. But this is no problem for the conspiracy theorist. Gleefully, they claim that a few thousand gallons of kerosine is enough to:

  • completely vapourize a 65 ton aircraft
  • have enough left over to burn ferociously enough for over an hour at the impact point to melt steel (melting point about double the maximum combustion temperature of the fuel) and
  • still have enough left over to pour down the elevator shafts and start similarly destructive fires all through the building.

This kerosine really is remarkable stuff! How chilling to realize that those kerosine heaters we had in the house when I was a kid were deadly bombs, just waiting to go off. One false move and the entire street might have been vapourized. And never again will I take kerosine lamps out camping. One moment you're there innocently holding the lamp — the next — kapow! vapourized into nothing along with with the rest of the camp site, and still leaving enough of the deadly stuff to start a massive forest fire.

These whackos are actually claiming that the raging inferno allegedly created by the miraculously recycling, and impossibly hot burning kerosine melted or at least softened the steel supports of the skyscraper. Oblivious to the fact that the smoke coming from the WTC was black, which indicates an oxygen-starved fire — therefore, not particularly hot, they trumpet an alleged temperature in the building of 2000°C, without a shred of evidence to support this curious suspension of the laws of physics.

Not content with this ludicrous garbage, they then contend that as the steel frames softened, they came straight down instead of buckling and twisting and falling sideways.

Since they've already re-engineered the combustion qualities of jet fuel, violated the second law of thermodynamics, and re-defined the structural properties of steel, why let a little thing like the laws of gravity get in the way?

The tower fell in a time almost identical to that of a free-falling object, dropped from that height, meaning that it's physically impossible for it to have collapsed by the method of the top floors smashing through the lower floors. But according to the conspiracy theorists, the laws of gravity were temporarily suspended on the morning of Sept 11. It appears that the evil psychic power of those dreadful Arabs knew no bounds. Even after they were dead, they were able, by the power of their evil spirits, to force down the tower at a speed physically impossible under the laws of gravity, had it been meeting any resistance from fireproofed steel structures originally designed to resist many tons of hurricane force wind as well as the impact of a Boeing passenger jet straying off course.

Clearly, these conspiracy nuts never did their science homework at school, but did become extremely adept at inventing tall tales for why.
"Muslim terrorists stole my notes, sir"
"No miss, the kerosine heater blew up and vapourized everything in the street, except for my passport."
"You see sir, the schoolbus was hijacked by Arabs who destroyed my homework because they hate our freedoms."
Or perhaps they misunderstood the term "creative science" and mistakenly thought that coming up with such rubbish was, in fact, their science homework.

The ferocious heat generated by this ghastly kerosine was, according to the conspiracy theorists, the reason why so many of the WTC victims can't be identified. DNA is destroyed by heat. (Although 2000°C isn't really required, 100°C will generally do the job.) This is quite remarkable, because according to the conspiracy theorist, the nature of DNA suddenly changes if you go to a different city. That's right! If you are killed by an Arab terrorist in New York, your DNA will be destroyed by such temperatures. But if you are killed by an Arab terrorist in Washington DC, your DNA will be so robust that it can survive temperatures which completely vapourize a 65 ton aircraft.

You see, these loonies have somehow concocted the idea that the missile which hit the pentagon was not a missile at all, but one of the hijacked planes. And to prove this unlikely premise, they point to a propaganda statement from the Bush regime, which rather stupidly claims that all but one of the people aboard the plane were identified from the site by DNA testing, even though nothing remains of the plane. The plane was vapourized by the fuel tank explosion maintain these space loonies, but the people inside it were all but one identified by DNA testing.

So there we have it. The qualities of DNA are different, depending upon which city you're in, or perhaps depending upon which fairy story you're trying to sell at any particular time.

This concoction about one of the hijacked planes hitting the Pentagon really is a howler. For those not familiar with the layout of the Pentagon, it consists of 5 rings of building, each with a space inbetween. Each ring of building is about 30 to 35 ft deep, with a similar amount of open space between it and the next ring. The object which penetrated the Pentagon went in at about a 45-degree angle, punching a neat circular hole of about a 12-foot diameter through three rings (six walls). A little later a section of wall about 65 ft wide collapsed in the outer ring. Since the plane which the conspiracy theorists claim to be responsible for the impact had a wing span of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft, and there was no wreckage of the plane, either inside or outside the building, and the lawns outside were still smooth and green enough to play golf on, this crazy delusion is clearly physically impossible.

But hey, we've already disregarded the combustion qualities of jet fuel, the normal properties of common building materials, the properties of DNA, the laws of gravity and the second law of thermodynamics, so what the hell — why not throw in a little spatial impossibility as well? I would have thought that the observation that a solid object cannot pass through another solid object without leaving a hole at least as big as itself is reasonably sound science. But to the conspiracy theorist, this is "mumbo jumbo". It conflicts with the delusion that they're hooked on, so it "must be wrong" although trying to get then to explain exactly how it could be wrong is a futile endeavour.

Conspiracy theorists fly into a curious panic whenever the Pentagon missile is mentioned. They nervously maintain that the plane was vapourized by it's exploding fuel load and point to the WTC crash as evidence of this behavior. (That's a wonderful fruit loop.) Like an insect which has just been sprayed, running back and forth in its last mad death throes, they first argue that the reason the hole is so small is that plane never entered the wall, having blown up outside, and then suddenly backflip to explain the 250 ft deep missile hole by saying that the plane disappeared all the way into the building, and then blew up inside the building (even though the building shows no sign of such damage). As for what happened to the wings — here's where they get really creative. The wings snapped off and folded into the fuselage which then carried them into the building, which then closed up behind the plane like a piece of meat.

When it suits them, they'll also claim that the plane slid in on its belly (ignoring the undamaged lawn) while at the same time citing alleged witnesses to the plane diving steeply into the building from an "irrecoverable angle." How they reconcile these two scenarios as being compatible is truly a study in stupidity.

Once they get desperate enough, you can be sure that the UFO conspiracy stuff will make an appearance. The Arabs are in league with the Martians. Space aliens snatched the remains of the Pentagon plane and fixed most of the hole in the wall, just to confuse people. They gave the Arabs invisibility pills to help get them onto the planes. Little green men were seen were seen talking to Bin Laden a few weeks prior to the attacks.

As the nation gears up to impeach the traitor Bush, and stop his perpetual oil war, it's not helpful to have these idiots distracting from the process by spreading silly conspiracy theories about mythical Arabs, stories which do nothing but play into the hands of the extremist Bush regime.

At a less serious time, we might tolerate such crackpots with amused detachment, but they need to understand that the treachery that was perpetrated on Sept 11, and the subsequent war crimes committed in "retaliation", are far too serious for us to allow such frivolous self-indulgence to go unchallenged.

Those who are truly addicted to conspiracy delusions should find a more appropriate outlet for their paranoia. It's time to stop loony conspiracy theories about Sept 11.

21 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

How can you post such ridiculous drivel?

Friday, 11 August, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Holmgren appears to have given up.An incredible loss to the 911 Truth movement.Big Brother Bush is winning.

Tuesday, 06 November, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What I don't understand is why they used alleged Saudi terrorists. Why didn't they use Iraqis?

Wednesday, 23 July, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the most narrow-minded article i have read on the internet yet.. DO YOUR RESEARCH before you post something this offensive... look at the pentagon's damage, you mean to tell me that was an 80 ton jet? and im naive.. YEAH!

Sunday, 09 November, 2008  
Blogger gfutfy said...

This momentousdecree warcraft leveling came as a great beacon light wow lvl of hope to millions of negroslaves wow power level who had been seared power leveling in the flames of power leveling withering wrath of the lich king power leveling injustice.wrath of the lich king power leveling it came as a WOTLK Power Leveling joyous daybreak to end the long WOTLK Power Leveling night ofcaptivity.WOTLK Power Leveling but one hundred years wlk power leveling later, we must face aoc gold the tragic fact thatthe age of conan power leveling negro is still not free. aoc power leveling one hundred years later,age of conan power leveling the lifeof the negro ffxi gil is still sadly crippled by the final fantasy xi gil manacles ofsegregation guild wars gold and the chains of discrimination. one hundred yearslater, maplestory mesos the negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in themidst of a vast ocean of material prosperity.dog clothes one hundred yearslater

Thursday, 05 February, 2009  
Blogger haddouch said...

Well! what you have already said is very logical. We are now totally aware, through what happened and what is happening right now, that the US follows a "stupid" and weak strategy by creating a new enemy and trying to fight it, thus, being again and again, the "savior of democracy"!!!Take, for instance, the case of Iraq, Afganistan,...And right now, we have the war against " Muslim and Arab terrorists"!!!!That s so ridiculous nad silly!!!

Wednesday, 04 March, 2009  
Blogger haddouch said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

Wednesday, 04 March, 2009  
Anonymous Veronica said...

I notice that those who have criticised this article have taken the time & trouble to think very hard about the subject matter and very carefully explain their problem with it in the finest of detail.

It's very refreshing not to see comments such as "How can you post such ridiculous drivel?", and so on ... which seems to be the moronic 'norm' nowadays.

Sunday, 09 August, 2009  
OpenID psikeyhackr said...

Let’s just face a few simple facts.

Skyscrapers MUST hold themselves up. They must also sway in the wind. The people who design skyscrapers MUST figure out how much steel and how much concrete they are going to put on every level before they even dig the hole for the foundation.

After EIGHT YEARS why don’t we have a table specifying the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level of WTCs 1&2? The NIST report does not even specify the TOTAL for the concrete. The total for the steel is in three places. So even if the planes did it that 10,000 page report is CRAP!

Conspiracies are irrelevant. The Truth Movement should be marching on all of the engineering schools in the country.

Watch that Purdue simulation. If a 150 ton airliner crashes near the top of a skyscraper at 440 mph isn’t the building going to sway? Didn’t the survivors report the building “moving like a wave”? So why do the core columns in the Purdue video remain perfectly still as the plane comes in?

That is the trouble with computer simulations. If they are good, they are very good. But if they have a defect either accidental or deliberate they can be REALLY STUPID once you figure out the flaws.

The distributions of steel and concrete are going to affect the sway of a skyscraper whether it is from the wind or an airliner.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

How much does one complete floor assembly weigh?

You know those square donut floor slabs? They were 205 ft square with a rectangular hole for the core. There was a steel rebar mesh embedded in the concrete which was poured onto corrugated steel pans which were supported by 35 and 60 foot trusses. There has been talk about those things pancaking on each other for years.

But has anyone ever said what the whole thing weighed? Why haven't we seen that A LOT in EIGHT YEARS? The concrete alone is easy to compute, about 601 tons. But the concrete could not be separated from the entire assembly, the upper knuckles of the trusses were embedded into the concrete. So what did the whole thing weigh and why haven't the EXPERTS been mentioning that A LOT in EIGHT YEARS?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

So why hasn't Richard Gage and his buddies produced a table with the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level of the WTC? How much computing power do they have now, compared to the early 1960s when the buildings were designed? I asked Gage about that in May of 2008 at Chicago Circle Campus and he got a surprised look on his face and gave me this LAME excuse about the NIST not releasing accurate blueprints. Gravity hasn't changed since the 1960s. They should be able to come up with some reasonable numbers.

Tuesday, 29 December, 2009  
Anonymous Pete W. said...

I am saddened that Mr. Holmgren has apparently passed away by the time this comment of mine was made in Sept. of 2014. I would have liked to offer him some criticisms as well as some praise for doing such a well written but fallacious, turn-the-tables type spoof of those of us who insist on debunking the truth in such pervasive and massive conspiracies, let alone agree that they were carried out in reality.

I would have like to let him know that, although I have been researching the claims of 911 conspiracy theorists for more than a week, and also reading those who have debunked it--like Popular Mechanics, NIST, and even Noam Chomsky, who brought up the apparent illogic of Bush blaming the attack on Saudis--who are a primary source of vast oil riches--instead of his strange choice to scapegoat Iraq instead-- (especially since Saddam Hussein had no interests in religion and had no real connection with Al Qaeda? Mr. Chomsky also pointed out the unlikelihood that a cabal or group of insiders capable of carrying out such a supposedly massive deception as 911, could not even come up with a way to guarantee that their story about WMDs would be accepted by the American public? Sorry if Gerald would consider me gullible or motivated by paranoia--I could have sworn instead, that I was actually using common sense, just like Noam! What a fool I am!

Anyway, what Mr. Holmgren deserve is a high score for creativity, and, even some excellent muckraking when examinations the various conspiracies in our past. Unfortunately, while he makes an excellent case for proving that our government uses deceit and propaganda to justify convenient wars, and has falsified the reasons for participating in them, this does not mean Mr. Holmgren has proven a whit about the actual role of the government in 911!

I believe Google has informed me that Mr. Holmgren died in 2010 and so may not have witnessed some of the more fanciful political delusions of late, like the claim that a group of terrorists called ISIS, who make Al Qaeda look like choirboys, has successfully routed a large part of Iraq, killed thousands of innocent women and children, and threatened to massacre thousands of Kurdish people! that is, if not for the aerial bombardments authorised by Obama. I only wish that Gerald was here to fill us all in on how such a massive illusion about another group of non-existent murderers has been successfully spread?

The fact that one conspiracy does exist, does not in any logical way prove that the 911 truther conspiracy, or any other conspiracy, automatically exists. When discussing the fact that some of these have actually happened--even many of them--he has made an excellent case supporting the existence of scandals themselves. Sadly though, even though the evidence that Bush and his people falsified the whole WMD thing to justify going after tons of oil may be true, logically speaking, that does not lend credibility to the notion that he deliberately murdered 3000 of his fellow citizens or that he would cavalierly deliver a death blow to the financial center of America--

If A exists, that alone does not prove that B exists!

People like Mr. Holmgren spend a great deal of time exclaiming "How could that happen?" But when scientists and engineers, then go ahead and tell them just how it can, they only scoff, and refuse to listen.

But,For what its worth, I really do regret that he can no longer respond to letters like mine personally!

Monday, 29 September, 2014  
Anonymous Pete W. said...

For the benefit of psikeyhacker, or anyone else wondering about the weight of each floor, or of the towers themselves---Here is a website that lists some of the statistics about the WTC:


http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/wtc/about/facts.html

It lists the total weight of the Twin towers at 1,500,000 tons. So, if each tower had 110 stories, that would put the weight per floor at about 13,636 tons.

However, the site doesn't say if, their weight as listed, includes the tons of furniture, computers, chairs,curtains, printers, and office supplies that each floor contained--not to mention the weight of the many employees on each floor. Each floor also included one acre of rentable space.

If these extra materials brought the weight up to 15,000 tons, than the ten or twenty floors above the crash levels could weigh as much as 150,000 to 300,000 tons. So, the combined weight of all of these higher floors came crashing down with near irresistible inertia--beginning a chain reaction or pancaking effect.

Sounds perfectly believable to me. That that much weight could indeed, initiate an irresistible pancaking force that completely leveled the building!

Tuesday, 30 September, 2014  
Anonymous Petew said...

About the claim that the twin towers fell at rate of gravitational force--common sense actually proves that they wouldn't have been able to do that, unless the entire towers, disintegrated immediately, and if the upper floors, encountered no resistance at all, when each successive floor collapsed after pancaking beneath the enormous weight of the floors above them.

The evidence of this can be seen in videos of the Towers as they fell--the debris blown out the sides of each floor, can be seen falling faster than the actual towers themselves, since this debris is encountering little or no resistance as it falls. However the upper floors would have had to overcome the inertia of each successive floor, as it crushed them down one by one. And in fact, timing the period from the beginning of the collapse to the end of the collapse, can be seen as easily exceeding nine seconds, which it would have taken only without encountering any resistance at all from each successive floor.

Various debunking sites clearly show that the time was actually 14 seconds or more, from beginning to end, for each tower. The majority of scientists and structural engineers are not ignoring the laws of physics, they are simply ignoring the false assumptions about those laws which so many "truthers" want to believe!

Tuesday, 07 October, 2014  
Blogger Caroline said...

Helpful once ya news,
thanks a lot ya pa home design | house design | motor cycle admin has given this good news.

Tuesday, 07 April, 2015  
Blogger Samanta said...

Nice information,, terrimaksih infonya..sukses much for sharing the info and the website is always to be the best and do cara memperbesar penis the best to the next information ..

Tuesday, 19 May, 2015  
Blogger Samanta said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

Tuesday, 19 May, 2015  
Blogger carneado said...

all had been presented with a superbike yamaha perfect through this free home design website .. sharp and design for home accurate information reliable .. thanks you have willingly shared with us.

Friday, 17 June, 2016  
Blogger 柯云 said...

2016-06-22keyun
pandora charms
oakley outlet
hollister jeans
michael kors outlet
michael kors purses
louis vuitton outlet online
replica watches
coach outlet store
coach factory outlet
concord 11
vans outlet
cheap basketball shoes
toms shoes outlet
gucci handbags
cheap louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton outlet
kd 8
true religion outlet
ray ban sunglasses outlet
coach factory outlet online
polo ralph lauren
celine bags
designer handbags
toms wedges
coach outlet store online
nfl jerseys
nike air huarache
coach outlet
kobe 8
air jordan homme
jordan retro 4
ray ban sunglasses
nike air force 1 shoes
ray ban sunglasses outlet
jordan 3 powder blue
christian louboutin sale
fitflop sale
true religion outlet store
abercrombie outlet

Wednesday, 22 June, 2016  
Blogger Atley said...

had I not know how to flash mobile phone this knowledge, but modern home design after reading this article I became more knowledge rooting android samsung for how to root andoid the home and design knowledge how to fix mobile phone I need, how to flash phone thank you

Tuesday, 30 August, 2016  
Blogger wat ngsi said...

can http://moxiemostudio.blogspot.com, put http://candtkimball.blogspot.com, wooden http://dontlethereatcake.blogspot.com, every http://graciousrabbitbones.blogspot.com, part http://notreadymaketonice.blogspot.com, your http://fabulouslydirtymartinis.blogspot.com, house http://gofindhappy.blogspot.com, includes http://fritsgroenevelt.blogspot.com, living http://irenefilipeworks.blogspot.com, room http://cloudyskies8.blogspot.com,

Monday, 24 July, 2017  
Blogger wat ngsi said...

below http://stylelifenyc.blogspot.com, There http://tresunii.blogspot.com, blue http://musebykara.blogspot.com, wall http://smoothielicioussims.blogspot.com, which http://frendmoarltackilegacy.blogspot.com, combined http://n9nedivines.blogspot.com, with http://veggieandtofu.blogspot.com, white http://poopypantsmcgee.blogspot.com, ornament http://happyhourlosangeles.blogspot.com, wall http://stefdavid.blogspot.com,

Monday, 24 July, 2017  
Blogger Unknown said...

and http://mallusims3.blogspot.com, show http://escritapet.blogspot.com, your http://sims3sisters.blogspot.com, personality http://littlelillyblack.blogspot.com, You http://tinkerandpixieknits.blogspot.com, can http://wolfatc.blogspot.com, also http://elecakes.blogspot.com, combine http://sophiamagnolia.blogspot.com, those http://armielsimsinjericho.blogspot.com, two http://annosims.blogspot.com,

Monday, 24 July, 2017  

Post a Comment

<< Home